Internet-Draft ((TO BE COMPLETED)) June 2025
Gallagher Expires 27 December 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
((TO BE COMPLETED))
Internet-Draft:
draft-gitlab-template-latest
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
A. Gallagher, Ed.
PGPKeys.EU

((TO BE COMPLETED))

Abstract

This document specifies ((TO BE COMPLETED))

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at ((GITLAB PAGE URL)). Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gitlab-template/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at ((REPO URL)).

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 December 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

((TO BE COMPLETED))

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Section Name

This document uses Kramdown-rfc2629 format. Put one sentence per line, this makes git diff work better. You can refer to an anchor link (such as a section or table) using Section 3. You can refer to a normative or informative document using [RFC4880], [SHAMBLES].

Table 1: Here is how you insert a table
Field Description
version the version of this output format
count the number of items

3.1. Reflow Testing

This section contains some sample text for testing the reflow script.

  • This is a list.

    • This is a sub-list.

  • This is a multiline list entry. Multiline items should have their continuation lines indented like this.

  • This is also a list.

    • This is also a sub-list.

  • The same rules apply to lists with different kinds of bulletpoints. For example, multi-line items should also work.

  1. This is a numbered list.

  2. Numbered list bulletpoints should not be line-split.

  3. Even if they get the numbering wrong.

Common abbreviation such as e.g. and i.e. should not cause a line-split. Nor should names like Phil R. Zimmermann or John Q. Public.

Exclamations should also be handled gracefully! What about questions? Them too.

What if e.g. a question ends with a single letter such as A? Exclamations can also end with A! And sometimes a sentence ends with A. All the above should work.

4. Security Considerations

((TO BE COMPLETED))

5. IANA Considerations

This document assigns the following identifiers: ((TO BE COMPLETED))

6. References

6.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC4880]
Callas, J., Donnerhacke, L., Finney, H., Shaw, D., and R. Thayer, "OpenPGP Message Format", RFC 4880, DOI 10.17487/RFC4880, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4880>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

6.2. Informative References

[SHAMBLES]
Leurent, G. and T. Peyrin, "Sha-1 is a shambles: First chosen-prefix collision on sha-1 and application to the PGP web of trust", , <https://sha-mbles.github.io/>.

Appendix A. Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank ((TO BE COMPLETED)).

Author's Address

Andrew Gallagher (editor)
PGPKeys.EU